Quote:
|
Originally Posted by infoterror
To what do you attribute the interesting lack of any world-changing philosophy from academia in over forty years?
|
Short answer: I don't know.
I am curious about the "40 year" stipulation - what would you say was the last "world-changing philosophy?" I don't disagree with you, I am just having trouble thinking of anything that occurred so recently.
My big three for world-changing are Aristotle, Newton and Freud. These are people who radically changed the way we conceptualize the world. (There are others, to be sure [Plato, Descartes, Hume, Marx, Darwin, Einstein, to name a few].)
Is it possible that such wide-sweeping - and as such, world-changing - philosophy is no longer possible? Are we at a point that there is only the possibility of a deeper understanding of general ideas already put forth?
Again, I don't know.
I would say that, at this point, men like Craig Venter (gene sequencing's poster boy) and Edward Mitton (M Theory) are the ones currently changing the way we view the world.