Ultimate Metal Forum  
UltimateMetal.com homeContact UltimateMetal.com
 
Ultimate Metal Zine Ultimate Metal Photo Gallery Ultimate Metal Classifieds Ultimate Metal Link Directory Ultimate Metal Events Ultimate Metal Radio Ultimate Metal Store

Sponsors

Go Back   Ultimate Metal Forum > The Life > The Philosopher


Register FAQ Donate Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

The Philosopher Intelligent (and mature) discussions only.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old September 5th, 2007, 03:55 PM   #126 (permalink)
Justin S.
Senior Member
 
Justin S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,004
I am also in the midst (again) of the Critique of Pure Reason, after going through some of Hume's work. Unfortunately, reading it along with Heidegger's work is not really feasible for me at the moment. I'm interested to hear your general impressions derbeder, if you don't mind further ruining/murdering this board .

I'm taking an overload semester so my reading schedule is inflexible- in addition to my more literal "philosophy" fare, I decided to enroll in a 400 Dostoevsky course (in the Russian department) that reads his entire body of work... lacking any familiarity with the language doesn't make it easy!

Last edited by Justin S. : September 5th, 2007 at 03:59 PM.
Justin S. is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old September 5th, 2007, 04:19 PM   #127 (permalink)
derbeder
in a vicious circle
 
derbeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: lost
Posts: 1,875
Heidegger himself admits in the 1973 preface to the Kantbook that he has overinterpreted Kant's First Critique. As he was thinking about how to actually provide an account of Being in terms of originary temporality (what was supposed to go into Division 3 of Being and Time), Heidegger lectured on the Critique (winter 1927/28) and sought for a solution to his own problems by trying to find clues in Kant's discussion of time, imagination and the role of the schemata of pure concepts of understanding. His interpretation of Kant in the lecture and this book is therefore colored heavily by his own problematic in Being and Time. The projected Division 1 of the "destructive" Part 2 of BT, "Kant's doctrine of the schematism and of time, as the preliminary stage of a problem of Temporality" turned out as this book, but I think there is a lot here that relates to what was to become Division 3 of Part 1.
In the preface he says he was "led to interpret the Critique of Pure Reason from within the horizon of the manner of questioning set forth in Being and Time. In truth, however, Kant's question is foreign to it, even though it would have given another meaning to the presupposed manner of questioning." He adds here on his own copy of the book that he has attempted "to question what has not been said, instead of writing in a fixed way about what Kant said." This is basically what he does with all philosophers from Heraclitus to Nietzsche, of course.

The discussion of the power of imagination and the importance of the chapter on the schematism are very interesting, but are not accurate interpretations of Kant's meaning. The book and the lecture are important guides to how Heidegger conceived of the positive project of Being and Time, however.

Last edited by derbeder : September 5th, 2007 at 04:58 PM.
derbeder is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2007, 09:58 AM   #128 (permalink)
bluebongbubbles
drunk disheveled dude
 
bluebongbubbles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: shithole, USA
Posts: 18
Thus Spoke Zarathustra - Freidrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
my favorite book of all time
__________________
HAILS FROM HEL!
bluebongbubbles is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2007, 01:24 PM   #129 (permalink)
AbbyTritonus
A woman :O
 
AbbyTritonus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: West Wales, United Kingdom
Posts: 6
"Thus Spoke Zarathustra" is a very good book.

I've just finished reading "1984" by George Orwell (again..). I think it's a very interesting theory and well-written book, but the ending was a bit disappointing for me. Also just finished "White Line Fever", which is Lemmy's autobiography. He portrays his views very well, and it never fails to make me laugh.

I'm currently halfway through "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley, which I spent a long time trying to find, and seems interesting. I'm also reading "The Long Run: A Tale of the Continuing Time" which is just an excellent book, but unfortunatelu near impossible to buy.
__________________
AbbyTritonus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old October 12th, 2007, 09:22 AM   #130 (permalink)
kmik
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 556
Has anyone read Finnegans Wake?
kmik is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old October 12th, 2007, 10:02 AM   #131 (permalink)
Blowtus
Senior Member
 
Blowtus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Straya
Posts: 647
I am in the midst of 'The Brothers Karamazov' by Dostoevsky.
Blowtus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old October 12th, 2007, 10:16 AM   #132 (permalink)
fates warning 666
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 307
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmik View Post
Has anyone read Finnegans Wake?
I will do one day. Honest.

ATM I'm reading Lattimore's translation of The Iliad, Herodotus' Histories, Nietzsche's Birth of Tragedy, Erikson's Midnight Tides, Hamlet over and over, and occasionally some Harold Bloom.
fates warning 666 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old October 12th, 2007, 10:23 AM   #133 (permalink)
Justin S.
Senior Member
 
Justin S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmik View Post
Has anyone read Finnegans Wake?
There is... this one guy around here who I know has read it, but good luck getting him to (single) post about it. He's English and quite queer you understand.
Justin S. is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old October 12th, 2007, 11:31 AM   #134 (permalink)
kmik
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 556
Read it in the sense that he went over the words and pronounced them and his head? In the sense that he could tell, at least vaguely, what each sentence is about? In the sense that he made sense of the novel as a whole? Found some themes or ideas expressed in it? In the sense that he could tell a passage from something typed at random? In the sense that he has actually ENJOYED it?

If yes, then he is my personal hero (I can only assume that's Nile557?).

I was always sure this novel was a joke but Ive read Joyce worked really hard on it. So it must be a pretty good joke.

Anyway, what this sentence:

"O here here how hoth sprowled met the duskt the father of fornicationists but, (O my shining stars and body!) how hath fanespanned most high heaven the skysign of soft advertisement!"

is about, how does it relate to the rest of the novel or any of the ideas it explores (or to character development, if there's such a thing, or whatever) and what the hell does it mean? Thanks!
kmik is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old October 12th, 2007, 04:58 PM   #135 (permalink)
Nile577
Senior Member
 
Nile577's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: England
Posts: 399
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmik View Post
"O here here how hoth sprowled met the duskt the father of fornicationists but, (O my shining stars and body!) how hath fanespanned most high heaven the skysign of soft advertisement!"
The Wake refers to the entirety of itself in nearly every sentence so, in many ways, the bit you quote is about everything, everywhere all at once. It's also written in nearly every language simultaneously with multiple allusions to all of western literature, a great deal of eastern literature and pretty much every mythological tradition. Any praise of it from me would be entirely superfluous. Nothing like it can ever be written again.

It's probably helpful, then, to try and situate the sentence you quote a bit. The Wake is roughly mapped to the Italian philosopher Giambattista Vico's cyclic view of "cultural" history. For example, the last words in the "book," "A way a lone a last a loved a long the," run on to join the first words "rivverun, past Eve and Adam's." The "commodius vicus of recirculation" (from the opening page) is both an allusion to this cyclic form ("Vicus (Vico) of recirculation") and a humorously self-deprecating reference to the Wake's as a "load of shit" (commode) filled with recycled quotes ("recirculation") which one must plough trough.

The passage you quote occurs very early on, when Joyce speaks of The Fall. The "fall" is many things, both miniscule and cosmic. It is Adam & Eve's eating from the tree of knowledge ("When he yeat ye abblokooken" (When he eats the cooking apple (forbidden fruit), with abblokooen reminding also of the German word Apfelkuchen, meaning apple pie - with also a further allusion to the poet Yeats, who, due to his revivalist sensibilities, Joyce regarded as being (to paraphrase) “beyond help” when they met.) "The fall" - "Bababadalgharaghtakamminarronnkonnbronntonnerronn tuonnthunntrovarrhounawnskawntoohoohoordenenthurnu kis" (which depicts the word "thunder" in many different languages) - is also the fall into language, and the fall of Irish political leader ("The Uncrowned King of Ireland") Charles Stuart Parnell, who so nearly achieved Home Rule before being undone by an affair with a woman called Kitty O Shea. It is, therefore, also the fall of Ireland. It is the fall of humpty dumpty ("That humptyhillhead of humself prumptly sends an unquiring one well to the west in quest of his tumptytumtoes). It is the fall into divisions and conflicts. And (as I will try to argue in my Ph.D thesis), it is the Heideggerian "fall" into-being, as dasein. It is also the fall of the main character(s) in the book, H.C.E., both man (Humphrey Chimpden Earwicker - chimpden perhaps is an allusion to Darwin) and men (Here Comes Everybody). H.C.E man/men also represents the earth: "Howth Castle and Environs," just as his wife, A.L.P. - Anna Livia Plurabelle - represents the river. H.C.E. is embroiled (“fallen”) in some kind of sexual scandal with his daughter, though the details are never made explicit.

To look at the specific passage you quote:

"O here here" should be seen in context with the previous lines, which detail numerous "falls" and conflicts of man from the specific to the grandiose. The passage is a litany of falleness. Our location is revealed in the previous paragraph "Where oranges have been laid to rust upon the green" (The colours of the Irish flag), though it is, of course, everywhere as well as Ireland. "Here here" is a vocal expression given by MPs in parliament to pledge support to a cause (possible connotations to the case of Parnell, who was leader of the Home Rule League). It is also, of course, an invitation to listen.

"how hoth sprowled met the duskt the father of fornicationists"

"How Hoth" is "Howth," is Howth Castle, north of Dublin, is H.C.E. is man, is men. "Sprowled" is sprawled - flung out of Eden, denied home rule, lost in language - and "prowled," like a beast & reminding of Earwicker's sexual scandal. "Met the duskt" is both "dust" and "dusk," with Finnegans Wake being a dream, an other, a "book of the night" to set against Ulysses' day. The snake in Eden was forced to crawl on his belly in the dust. The father of fornicationists is both Adam and Earwicker. The passage is brilliantly suggestive of an "Other" "duskt" of subconscious sexual desire, and also an "Other" of language, which undoes attempts to master it in the writing, with Freudian slips and destabilising deconstructions. Also, language is the house of Being. "Man acts as though he were the master of language, while in fact language remains the master of man" - Martin Heidegger

"but, (O my shining stars and body!) how hath fanespanned most high heaven the skysign of soft advertisement!"

"O my shining stars and body!" is a possible allusion to Christ and America, with "stars and stripes (Christ's scars)" reminding of the previous "Laurens County's gorgios doublin their mumper" (referencing there being another Dublin (doubled!) in Laruens County Georgia ("mumper" is Irish slang for "father" - "Topsawyer's rocks" are shamrocks and also an illusion to Tom Sawyer, whose "father" was Mark Twain (twain meaning split in two: doubling!) "My stars" was an Irish vernacular phrase.

"How hath fanespanned most high heaven" is very interesting. How hath is Howth (H.C.E.) castle. "Fanespanned" suggests "fane" (a flag or weathercock). So: "how Howth Castle flew its flag." But also, from the Bible, in Isaish we have "my right hand hath spanned the heavens," which is of course Joyce writing the Wake, and also an allusion to masturbation, with the pun on "weathercock." (The date of Ulysses marked the first time Joyce was given a hand-job without paying for it by his wife-to-be Nora Barnacle!) Creation then is God's hand-job. The Sistine chapel ceiling was also "spanned" by a hand, but Michelangelo was left-handed.

Finally, "the skysign of soft advertisement," refers to the weathervane of man's fall. The weathercock "advertises" the climate of life. The "ontological weather," if you like, of his state: angst. It also might refer to Spinoza's (much beloved of L. Bloom) pantheism, with the sky itself suggesting God by way of advertisement. It also might return to American culture and "soft advertisment" (soft drinks advertisments) to go with the "stars and body (stripes)" of the first part of the line. A flaccid penis is “A soft advertisement” of possible pleasures to come – at the very "beginning" of the Wake we are “before” the fall (into intercourse/sexuality?) (“had passencore rearrived” (pas encore, in French.)

I hope the above is somewhat helpful. I think it's rather crude to try and "translate" the Wake but I fear there is no tasteful way to write about it on an internet message board. There is likely much I've missed. The Wake is important because it moves towards a new way of thinking. Towards, as I will try to argue in my doctoral thesis, a "being-historical" awareness in which all cultures and mythology are disclosed and renewed authentically from within “language,” free from the drift of ideology, “revivalism” or studied "history."

Last edited by Nile577 : October 12th, 2007 at 08:20 PM.
Nile577 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote