|
|
| The Philosopher Intelligent (and mature) discussions only. |
 |
|
May 27th, 2008, 07:26 AM
|
#51 (permalink)
|
|
Dracula has a moon base..
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Belfast, Ireland
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Einherjar86
You mean you've been socially conditioned to be repulsed by violence.
|
 not really
I'm not fond of acts of aggression or acts of violence on anyone or anything. I don't even kill moths anymore and god, I fucking hate moths. Though, violence is nature's method of passing on energy from one trophic level to the next sadly.
Thanks for telling me what I said though 
__________________
What I'm listening to this week:
Considered Dead - Gorguts
Slanted and Enchanted - Pavement
A Vision of Misery - Sadus
Eisenhower - The Slip
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitey131
ALL THINGS EVOLVED FROM JESUS!!
|
|
|
|
May 27th, 2008, 10:59 PM
|
#52 (permalink)
|
|
Brahman
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brahman
Posts: 39
|
It's my opinion that we are predisposed to be repulsed by violence. I haven't done much research about it but I would guess that studies would find babies would be aversely affected by the sight of violence, and I think it says something that the most truly happy people in the world are not the violent kind.
|
|
|
May 27th, 2008, 11:17 PM
|
#53 (permalink)
|
|
Winter is Coming...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Home in Buffalo, college in Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,932
|
I disagree. We're predisposed to find little reaction towards violence. If anything, human nature is drawn to violence. All human beings are constantly at war with themselves; trying to reconcile opposing emotions and passions. War/violence is the soul made manifest. If anything, society conditions us to feel repulsed by violence (for obvious reasons).
|
|
|
May 27th, 2008, 11:24 PM
|
#54 (permalink)
|
|
Brahman
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brahman
Posts: 39
|
If that's the case, this is my question. How have so many pacifistic and non-confrontational philosophies survived the centuries, yielding happy individuals? With the exception of T'ien T'ai Buddhism, I haven't come across any successful philosophies that accept violence as a possible means to happiness-- and even then, the masters know that as you contemplate, even though you find it an acceptable to be violent as a means to attain nirvana, nonviolence works better.
|
|
|
May 27th, 2008, 11:42 PM
|
#55 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Straya
Posts: 647
|
Plenty of philosophies and religions of all sorts have survived for a long term - their continued existence is not really indicative of anything regarding violence or non violence, imho. That you know of no successful philosophies that regard violence as a useful tool in some situations says something about either your breadth of knowledge, or your interpretation of such knowledge, I think. Utilitarianism, Liberalism, Satanism, Christianity, Islam... yada yada. All have been interpreted at some point as requiring violence.
|
|
|
May 28th, 2008, 12:15 AM
|
#56 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,121
|
However... there is still a huge difference between standing ones ground and a chainsaw massacre. How silly... if this were the case all babys would be little Bundys.
|
|
|
May 28th, 2008, 11:06 AM
|
#57 (permalink)
|
|
Brahman
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brahman
Posts: 39
|
Violence as a useful tool in certain situations and a human love of violence are completely different, no? Also, the success I was referring to was on a success rate as in the ability for the philosophy to produce self actualized, blissfully happy people. I don't imagine crusaders running around nearly as happy as Jesus, Zoroaster, Lao Tzu, Chuang Tzu, Baha'u'llah, Muhammad, Siddhartha Gautama, etc..
Christianity was interpreted to justify slavery, which from my opinion (heavy Buddhist influence here) is an institution that naturally leads humans to suffering -- both the masters and the slaves. Similar to what some ancient greeks (for example: Aristotle and Theucidides) were getting at-- The slaves are slaves to their masters in an obvious way, and the masters are slaves to their slaves in their hopelessness without them. At least on that level, Christianity was misinterpreted in such a way to bring about suffering for both slaves and slave owners.
|
|
|
May 28th, 2008, 12:34 PM
|
#58 (permalink)
|
|
dead but dreaming
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Thule
Posts: 172
|
^How would you define "happy people"?
__________________
Rule 23. of the universe: All small objects of value will disappear when set down.
|
|
|
May 28th, 2008, 03:21 PM
|
#59 (permalink)
|
|
Brahman
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brahman
Posts: 39
|
In my religion, it would be a total absence of suffering and desire. That's a little far fetched for some people, so I'll say happiness with a little bit of interpretation allowed. Generally, happiness would be wanting nothing more than you already have. This is a state of existence that IS possible to achieve, and has been done for centuries.
|
|
|
May 28th, 2008, 05:24 PM
|
#60 (permalink)
|
|
dead but dreaming
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Thule
Posts: 172
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that answers your question 
It's no wonder the philosophy produces happy people,
if it echoes its definition of happiness.
__________________
Rule 23. of the universe: All small objects of value will disappear when set down.
Last edited by jervi : May 28th, 2008 at 05:29 PM.
|
|
|
June 4th, 2008, 05:14 AM
|
#61 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: scone in Oz
Posts: 2
|
I enjoy violence. i liek watching fights and i like fighting. i watch horror movies as well as slashers and i make it my business to track down every abomination on the interbutts violent or otherwise. I dont find anything disgusting .
Its funny though. i used to never be able to watch anything violent or scary. i was afraid of the cat in toy story :|
|
|
|
|