|
|
| The Philosopher Intelligent (and mature) discussions only. |
 |
May 12th, 2008, 03:23 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 45
|
The American Theocracy
Although wherever one gazes in the United States, constant reminders of "the great American democracy" can be clearly seen, this is far from the truth. The office of the American president is essentially the role of the high priest of old, as he is only present to ensure the widespread prominence and respect of the rules of the Judeo-Christian Bible, which is perhaps the greatest work of fiction ever written. Discuss.
|
|
|
May 12th, 2008, 04:37 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Metacom
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Brookline MA - Heavy Metal Capitol of the metro Boston area (maybe)
Posts: 156
|
Well, sort of.
America's pretty secular in a lot of respects. Socially, we're very secular. Politically, I would make a few points.
No. 1
Hopefully you aren't one of those people who thinks the Christian Right shouldn't have a political voice. Obviously they should, because they live in America. That's pretty much the only qualification people are supposed to need, last time I checked.
No. 2
Everyone in America likes to feel fucking persecuted, so all the atheists whine about the all powerful cult of Christianity, and all the religious people whine about us secular types getting abortions all willy-nilly (yeah, I said willy-nilly) and commercializing their holidays and whatnot. As always, the truth is somewhere in the middle. Abortions are legal... gay marriage isn't but that's a state decision, so that's a problem with people, and not an sort of "theocracy". Te nature of the war we're currently engaged in is more economic than anything, although I'm aware that there are a lot of Christians who prefer to think of it as a war against Islam. I'm also aware that there are a lot of Christians who see pacifism as one of the most important facets of their faith.
And
as far as your description of the role of the president... just no. I've just finished studying my ass off all ear for AP US history, and no.
In conclusion, you bez with the Xtreme oversimplification, and pretty inaccurate.
|
|
|
May 13th, 2008, 06:36 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,707
|
The pres. has about as much power as a peanut. In this latest instance we have seen an abuse of peanut power which has been pretty powerful but we were attacked and have been for decades.
While its easy to say the "war" is about economics, but its screwed our economy. Granted many puppet masters have benefited, but they have been from many countries including the middle east. There is and has been a world wide desire to stop sneak attacks on civilian populations and a time came when many had had enough, thats where we were a few years back. Now people are mostly sick of the effects. Frankly if the madness would just stop the States would be glad to get back to our own affairs. All wars we have stepped in on over history prior to this one has been to stop one country who was attacking another country.
I have never felt Christian pressure from the government, but the press is making much about it these days. There is not the Christian population of this country so many think there is. If our morals seem close, so be it, that is a good thing regardless of its scetchy history, that has long been behind western culture. Christians are pushing harder lately and that is due to the continued decline of our state. Not all Christian sects are anti abortion. Primarily a Catholic or other hard core religious groups thing. Catholic ideals are also strong throughout Europe and South America. Many people that are believers are actually very liberal, open minded and keep it to themselves.
I see the first testament as the Jewish book of folklore and the "new" testament as somewhat more reasonable. However as with all tales of folklore amounst various cultures the point in many cases has been "the moral of the story" and they have been full of learned knowledge and intended as guidelines, something to think about. Even the Native Americans had story tellers whos stories were riddled with truths about consquences and they had no knowledge of "christianity"
No, I dont think people of other countries have a accurate account of the States, they only hear about or see the extremes. We try hard not to only see the extremes of other countries, but the press works that pretty hard as well. There is no story to sell in the average Americans daily life.
Yes, our government is a joke as I feel most countries are. People and power ($)... you know. But ultimately we all dance to the tune of stock traders, manipulators, big banking interests and corporate bliss, this applies to most countries.
Last edited by razoredge : May 13th, 2008 at 06:40 PM.
|
|
|
May 13th, 2008, 08:01 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Winter is Coming...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Home in Buffalo, college in Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,450
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by razoredge
No, I dont think people of other countries have a accurate account of the States, they only hear about or see the extremes. We try hard not to only see the extremes of other countries, but the press works that pretty hard as well. There is no story to sell in the average Americans daily life.
|
Good point that I agree with. While journalists do play an important and vital role, and have done a great deal of good for this country, they also do a great deal of harm. Journalists want the juiciest, most emotionally appealing story. However, anyone who studies critical thinking and logic knows that appeals to emotion are fallacies and corrupt the rationale of a human's thought process. It persuades them to favor certain parties over others without presenting all the facts. Very few journalists in the big newspapers and magazines present all the facts. They each have their own agenda, and part of that agenda is raking in the cash. There are a lot of people on this forum who actually are loathe to admit this; but journalists can be crooks too (not all of them are, I realize; but even the ones who aren't still deny their readers a completely objective view).
Now, on the American Theocracy:
The word "pagan" has acquired a negative aura surrounding it, and it's because of the intolerant Christian movement (not only in America, but in several European countries as well). The MPAA and other censorship committees actually view things such as "occult" and "pagan" elements as offensive and criteria for rating or censoring (possibly even banning) an album. This frustrates me to no end. Paganism and Satanism have been lumped in together by the intolerance of Christianity (which doesn't even make sense; but then, little of it does). The censorship in this country is harmful to artistic integrity and is all because of the influence of Christianity in this nation. It's just as bad in other countries too. Gorgoroth can never play in Poland again (for now, anyway) because of their show where they raised crosses and had sheeps' heads impaled across the front of the stage. They were charged with crimes against religion. To be quite honest, the only crime against religion I can recall was when Urban II called for a march to take the holy land back from the heathen in 1095.
|
|
|
May 13th, 2008, 10:18 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Metacom
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Brookline MA - Heavy Metal Capitol of the metro Boston area (maybe)
Posts: 156
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Einherjar86
Very few journalists in the big newspapers and magazines present all the facts. They each have their own agenda, and part of that agenda is raking in the cash.
|
As someone who actually knows a thing or two about the field of journalism, I can tell you it doesn't "rake in the cash" (lol). Not at all. I you're talking about the bigwigs at the top (the NOT journalists) it's a different story, and you'd be right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Einherjar86
The word "pagan" has acquired a negative aura surrounding it, and it's because of the intolerant Christian movement (not only in America, but in several European countries as well).
|
Oh, Goddamnit, not again. Ok. The appropriately vague "Christian movement" doesn't want to keep the "pagans" down. If you asked them what they thought of paganism, they'd ask you what the fuck you were talking about. Nobody is even aware that anybody still practices paganism, so they've got no reason to try and oppress it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Einherjar86
The MPAA and other censorship committees actually view things such as "occult" and "pagan" elements as offensive and criteria for rating or censoring (possibly even banning) an album.
|
Correction: they did, in the 80s. Now they don't. The reason they did in the 80s was because a lot of metal was associated with Satanism, which scared everyone over the age of 40. If you recall, this was pretty much what a lot of the record execs had in mind when they signed the bands in the first place.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Einherjar86
This frustrates me to no end. Paganism and Satanism have been lumped in together by the intolerance of Christianity (which doesn't even make sense; but then, little of it does).
|
I don't think so: Satanism is just silly, and nobody knows paganism is still practiced... which, actually it's not, but you know what I mean.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Einherjar86
The censorship in this country is harmful to artistic integrity and is all because of the influence of Christianity in this nation.
|
Can you actually sight any examples of censorship in America? I reaaaaaaalllly doubt it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Einherjar86
To be quite honest, the only crime against religion I can recall was when Urban II called for a march to take the holy land back from the heathen in 1095.
|
Oh, there are plenty more. Pretty much every major religion has a few. They all have a few fundamentals, you know?
|
|
|
May 13th, 2008, 10:27 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Metacom
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Brookline MA - Heavy Metal Capitol of the metro Boston area (maybe)
Posts: 156
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by razoredge
The pres. has about as much power as a peanut. In this latest instance we have seen an abuse of peanut power which has been pretty powerful but we were attacked and have been for decades.
|
The executive has a little more power than a peanut, and it just grew to fucking biblical proportions, in case you missed that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by razoredge
While its easy to say the "war" is about economics, but its screwed our economy.
|
Well, sort of. A lot of this screwed our economy, it would have happened anyways. Still, we didn't know it would even hurt before we went in. Most of our previous third world engagements have been for economic reasons.
Quote:
Originally Posted by razoredge
Yes, our government is a joke as I feel most countries are. People and power ($)... you know. But ultimately we all dance to the tune of stock traders, manipulators, big banking interests and corporate bliss, this applies to most countries.
|
That's not a very fun joke... 
|
|
|
May 14th, 2008, 04:57 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,707
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeAreTheLastMen
The executive has a little more power than a peanut, and it just grew to fucking biblical proportions, in case you missed that
|
I did mention it a bit, I thought - "In this latest instance we have seen an abuse of peanut power which has been pretty powerful"
I was more refering to how Presidential seat, upon presidential seat, term after term.... little is accomplished, as well as the government really doesnt run the country anyhow, or not as it should. Too much in some instance, not enough in others.
Einherjar - Christians are not the only people with concerns about content or that question the point of such content. Concernes were also not exclusive to metal/rock, there was/is large concern with Rap attitude for many reasons, even amounst the black community. Metal concern did not solely focus on satanism either, there were others.
Having been a parent that raised a child, I will tell you many things suddenly come into play when we consider what influences we want around our children, this is a natural ancient instinct and I sure as hell wasnt going to fight it.
Myself I just question the point of such lyrics or antics. I dont apply to them and am quite comfortable with that. You said jepordize artistic integrity... I would say... "what integrity?"
I will also say - while it all fell back on constitional "rights"... I found it laughable, because the simplist of rational thinking would make it obvious that those who wrote the constitution could not possibly conceive the point things have come to be. Freedom of speach was established for other reasons... not the "shock" factor. Once again I did not support censorship but rather hoped people could show a better side or find more tactful or self respecting ways of fighting faults with "the establishment" if that was their motive. I guess you could say I was annoyed that some felt the need to push it that far as to make spectical of the thing in the first place. All you had was extremes on both sides creating a scene, Im proud to not have been part of either side.
Of similiar topic - I am not in favor of futher extended gun laws, yet never owned one. However Im of sound mind to realize that when our founding fathers wrote the constitution they could not have possibly concieved random drive by shootings for example... or that children would not know enough or respect guns enough, not to shoot their brother or best friend in the head.
|
|
|
May 14th, 2008, 11:19 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Winter is Coming...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Home in Buffalo, college in Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,450
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeAreTheLastMen
As someone who actually knows a thing or two about the field of journalism, I can tell you it doesn't "rake in the cash" (lol). Not at all. I you're talking about the bigwigs at the top (the NOT journalists) it's a different story, and you'd be right.
|
I just meant that they go for the most emotionally appealing stories in order to guarantee a majority of reader sympathy; which they do. By "raking in the cash" I meant for their publication, not just them. I know plenty of journalists don't have it great, and I don't mean to imply that I don't like journalists or anything.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeAreTheLastMen
Oh, Goddamnit, not again. Ok. The appropriately vague "Christian movement" doesn't want to keep the "pagans" down. If you asked them what they thought of paganism, they'd ask you what the fuck you were talking about. Nobody is even aware that anybody still practices paganism, so they've got no reason to try and oppress it.
|
Sure there is. The church knows all about the neopagan movements in Scandinavia, many of them associated with black metal bands. They've openly spoken out against them, and religious states like Poland have banned bands from playing.
Besides, that's just a way for them to avoid the question. If they did become aware of it, you can be sure they wouldn't condone it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeAreTheLastMen
Correction: they did, in the 80s. Now they don't. The reason they did in the 80s was because a lot of metal was associated with Satanism, which scared everyone over the age of 40. If you recall, this was pretty much what a lot of the record execs had in mind when they signed the bands in the first place.
|
Okay, my bad. I assumed many Christians still make the connection. I wouldn't be surprised if many still do, actually. But that was an assumption, so I apologize.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeAreTheLastMen
I don't think so: Satanism is just silly, and nobody knows paganism is still practiced... which, actually it's not, but you know what I mean.
|
Paganism is still practiced; it's just ignored or sometimes laughed at because it seems like an untrue religion or belief system nowadays. But to the people who believe it and find it comforting and enlightening to adopt the religion of their forefathers, it's still very much in practice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeAreTheLastMen
Can you actually sight any examples of censorship in America? I reaaaaaaalllly doubt it.
|
*cite
The Nirvana song "Rape Me" was changed to "Waif Me" for distribution in major stores like Wal-Mart. This kind of stuff happens all the time, my friend. Bands that don't allow their song titles or lyrics to be changed suffer poor marketing and distribution efforts. This, in turn, affects sales. Now, on to movies:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0493459/
A very enlightening film.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeAreTheLastMen
Oh, there are plenty more. Pretty much every major religion has a few. They all have a few fundamentals, you know?
|
I know, I was making a point. The Crusades were by far one of the largest. I was just venting.
Last edited by Einherjar86 : May 15th, 2008 at 01:07 AM.
|
|
|
May 14th, 2008, 08:48 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Metacom
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Brookline MA - Heavy Metal Capitol of the metro Boston area (maybe)
Posts: 156
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Einherjar86
Besides, that's just a way for them to avoid the question. If they did become aware of it, you can be sure they wouldn't condone it.
|
True, but I think more in the way that they don't condone Judaism, or Islam, or Hinduism (because like most belief systems, they believe they're right and other people are wrong). The Church spoke against satanist black metalers because the whole point of Satanism is to hate Christianity (ok, at least ONE OF THE MAJOR POINTS).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Einherjar86
Paganism is still practiced; it's just ignored or sometimes laughed at because it seems like an untrue religion or belief system nowadays. But to the people who believe it and find it comforting and enlightening to adopt the religion of their forefathers, it's still very much in practice.
|
Ok, sorry. No offense meant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Einherjar86
The Nirvana song "Rape Me" was changed to "Waif Me" for distribution in major stores like Wal-Mart. This kind of stuff happens all the time, my friend. Bands that don't allow their song titles or lyrics to be changed suffer poor marketing and distribution efforts.
|
I did not know that.
How strong do you think the connection is between this and Christianity? Were the people who banned it just prudes, or was their being Christian their primary motivation for the censorship. I ask only because "rape Me" contains no blatant anti-Christian sentiments.
|
|
| |