Separate names with a comma.
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.
Discussion in 'LORD' started by Awake_In_Animosity, Apr 28, 2008.
Looks like Lars has realised he can make money off something he hated. In my opinion, no amount of solos will turn Metallicas new album into something listenable. I could be wrong though.
Wow! Even though it is spanned over a long period of time, he has just contradicted himself and the band in such a big way it makes him look stupid! "We're suing Napster" "Now free downloading is ok" i guess he's seen the light, or given up the fight...Metallica need the solos, but more than that....get rid of that snare sound, and ditch that bass player too....and grow your hair long again! These just seem to be indicators of Metallica's demise over the years.
In all honesty, it wouldn't be that hard for Metallica to make an awesome album. Think about it, all they have to do is tune to E standard, fuck with time signatures, downpick, and solo. Really Fast. They just choose not to do it, and it's their choice at the end of the day, but they must realise that they haven't made anything good since the black album.
Or anything awesome since 1986.
...AJFA was good, but i'd have to agree with Acey.
Yeah it was good, just not quite awesome. If they recorded an album as good as AJFA again I'd be happy.
Top Aussie Acts get together over music theft (SMH Article today)
I originally had this article reproduced here but thought that perhaps if you visit the site and hence download their advertising it won't be an "illegal copy". Print media has had problems making the transition to the digital world too.
You know, way back... half my life ago, before the WWW came to my little country university I tabbed out (from the book) and posted a copy of Skid Rows' Quicksand Jesus to a usenet news group. Now if you search my name on the internet you'll come up with about 5,000 hits for it. An act for which I remain profoundly embarrassed today. So perhaps it hasn't made much difference to the Skids revenue, but it was still wrong on three counts: firstly because I didn't ask permission, secondly because I'm the copyright notices on the tab book probably say "don't communicate or transmit" and thirdly (most importantly) because by doing so I effectively reduce the incentive for a customer to buy the tab book and hence provide some revenue to the Skids...
Did I know it was wrong at the time? No I don't think so. But ignorance is no excuse for the law as they say. At least now with all of the RIAA and MPAA and BSA coverage most people do realize that it is wrong and why.
Moral of the story: don't put anything on the net that you don't want to be remembered by... even if you have an obscure handle and avatar the more stuff you post the more likely a data-mining tool will be able to identify you. In the future people will probably be paid for that kind of detective work. People will want to see what Grandpa got up to when he was a kid.
They would be able to write a great album if they could spend all their money on a time machine instead of sueing people, and went back to when they weren't douches.;... wait, that could be a challenge too.
I paid $49 for a book of Crowded House sheet music the other day which was lazily arranged and less than half a centimeter thick. I paid $48 for it. I could buy a fucking encyclopedia for that money. Its such a sickening ripoff nowadays I don't even know where to start.
How the hell can a Crowded House song book be so thin??? They have soooo many great songs! Whole albums in fact where each song is awesome!
On the topic: Metallica really did die after Black...everything before then is awesome. I wouldnt even waste bandwidth downloading the rest.... In fact, by Lars stating he is ok with downloading, i am guessing it is a hint that this album wont be worth buying...maybe.
They're just fat and old and rich and couldn't care less anymore. I appreciate the fact that as artists they feel some desire to continue creating, but they will never match anything they did in the 80s even remotely and they know it even if they won't admit it. But I think they have to concede that it has to be preferable to offer tracks for download and make some money off them than to have them on Bit Torrent where they're not making anything.
Wtf Am I on drugs?
My point in general was that everything remotely connected to the music industry is a tremendous fucking ripoff and it just disappoints me when people as eminent as Jimmy Barnes go on record in the paper (yesterday) and hassle people for downloading when, as cliched as it sounds, the people who are filthy thieving bastards are the ones who Barnes et al signed their contracts with.
Solos didn't make Metallica.Take a look at St. Anger songs live they had solos and still sucked. They arn't really that great at them in the first place, when I was into Metallica I thought they were but after a while you realise they are nothing special. It was the attitude and the aggression that made Metallica what they were.
They just don't have that anymore. So no matter if they put solos or not they will never make another album just as good as the ones from the 80's. I don't feel they have the technically ability to make good music that doesn't sound like there 80's stuff.
Maybe, but the point that Barnes and the others were making is that the mug punter is under the impression that rock stars are rich, therefore it doesn't matter if you steal their music, and also that making, writing and recording music somehow doesn't cost anything and it's all some kind of free ride. The "Money for Nothing" mentality. That's just not the case as most of us here would appreciate. The record companies will always find a way to adapt to shifts in the market but it's the artists that really suffer, especially the smaller less established ones. People like Barnes and Metallica don't need to ever record another thing, or if they do they can virtually give away what they make, but most bands floating around on airplay lists and record charts still have massive debts to pay off and the ones that haven't quite made it yet are even more up the shit chute if their songs are being downloaded for free. The record labels can get their money from somewhere else; the bands can't.
Yeah, you've got some good points there Brian. Furthering what you said, though, Barnes and Metallica made their pile in an era when there was a shitload more money in the industry.
Still, I don't care if its Jimmy Barnes or Gyroscope (who were also interviewed in that story), I'm not prepared to line the wallets of the arseholes who run the record companies. When I pay $30 for a CD, and I know that 96.5% of that money is going to prop up the profit margins of Vivendi or AOL Time Warner, who didn't write the song, pen the lyrics, sing the words, or play the drums or keyboards or whatever, then they can get fucked. Seriously, there has never been a market of any kind of fine art in history for which the people who created the art were less appreciated or rewarded.
Yeah, I buy some CDs occasionally, but not very many at all - if anything, I'm more interested in buying second hand vinyl nowadays.
That's a valid point also. But most of the big labels are already recouping their losses from the music side of the business through other arms of entertainment. When you consider that the cost of CDs has hardly changed at all for more than a decade (and even dropped in some cases) it's pretty obvious that the major conglomerates must be off-setting expenses in other ways. If they weren't, recorded music would be prohibitively expensive by now: CDs would probably cost $70 - 80 or more and tracks on iTunes would be more than $1.25 or whatever they are.
Actually, come to think of it, it's probably the proliferation of small and boutique labels that's keeping music prices down, more than anything else. So if anything, we should be supporting the little guys as much as we can.
But then it turns out that "little old label" is owned by parent, whos parents own its sisters parents father who owns Sony, who owns Sonys far-removed brothers dog.
Anyone checked out the snippets of new stuff on http://www.missionmetallica.com ?
I'm keeping my expectations for the new album incredibly low, but what I've heard thusfar doesn't sound too bad!