This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.

Welcome to Our Community

Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.

TSE X50 vs. Peavey 6505

Discussion in 'Backline' started by Flow Of Time, Dec 30, 2012.

  1. Flow Of Time

    Flow Of Time Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2012
    Messages:
    686
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
  2. Trevoire520

    Trevoire520 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,055
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Fife, Scotland
    It's pretty close. I think (and I certainly could be wrong!) that the first amp is X50 and the second is the 6505.
     
  3. nezvers

    nezvers Beast

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,399
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Latvia, Riga
    It's really close! I can only guess that second is real deal.
     
  4. He's Dead, Jim

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,429
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    This makes me regret dropping money on Pod Farm hahah
     
  5. Melb_shredder

    Melb_shredder Orpheus: Melodic Death

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,854
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Melbourne
    I won't lie.. I can barely tell too much, but I'd guess the second is real. Less squishy etc? Bit more aggressive etc! So I'll guess the second is real :) Really cool though!
     
  6. ibzrgtoffire

    ibzrgtoffire Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    62
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    Qc, Canada
    Wow..... this is really sounding great. I have to go with the second too but the difference is barely noticeable in a mix context. Both great tones.

    What ir was used for this shootout?
     
  7. Ascendant

    Ascendant Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    596
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Second is real, though I wonder, did you use the correct red ch mod on the x50? Reason I'm asking is because the first one has less gain which would lead me to believe you've used the mk2 channel by mistake. Still, pretty amazing how close the x50 is to the real hardware with same settings and everything, just a tad muddy and lacks some sheen.
     
  8. Ericlingus

    Ericlingus Prettiest Hair Around

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2006
    Messages:
    1,375
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I liked the first one that plays in the clip. No idea if its the real or fake one though.
     
  9. UncleBob

    UncleBob Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I'll guess the first part is real, it's real close though.
     
  10. Flow Of Time

    Flow Of Time Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2012
    Messages:
    686
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Funny :D

    Results:
    1: 6505
    2: X50
    3: 6505
    4: X50

    The ir I used was the catharsis s-pres8 :)
     
  11. Melb_shredder

    Melb_shredder Orpheus: Melodic Death

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,854
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Well that makes me happy, the second tone suited better, so that's good to me haha
     
  12. UncleBob

    UncleBob Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    18
    To me it's that "squishyness" that usually means it's the real thing, that's the only reason I thought the first part of the clip was the real amp, if you randomly just skip around the track it's really hard to notice anything at all.
     
  13. binting

    binting bannedatthefirstpost

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2012
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    6505 then x50
     
  14. colonel_claypoo

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    939
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Germany
    the biggest difference for me is in the low end. x50 has quite a bit more of that.
     
  15. TheDude

    TheDude Jocke Skog

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    1,556
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Stockholm - Sweden
    x50 sounds a lot better then. Good! ;)
     
  16. onqel

    onqel Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,304
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Norway
    I have updated the X50 to v1.0.1, I had to do some fixes after getting new reamps.. let's just say I found a reason for the low end 'issue' :)
     
  17. Rhorschack

    Rhorschack Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    Lausanne
    Thanx. I just bought you a well deserved beer btw...
     
  18. colonel_claypoo

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    939
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Germany
    that's good news. thanks!
     
  19. abaga129

    abaga129 The Apprentice

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2012
    Messages:
    809
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Cape Girardeau, MO
    Mind = blown :loco:
     
  20. LBTM

    LBTM Proud Behringer User

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    902
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Blows minds!

    Pod Farm have a lot of cool amps. Not only a peavey simulation.
     

Share This Page