This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.

Welcome to Our Community

Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.

What's wrong with th current metal scene ?

Discussion in 'Old School Metal Discussion' started by Bruticus, Jul 1, 2018.

  1. Bruticus

    Bruticus Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2014
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    Upyowaaazzzzbeeutchhhhhh
    Obviously I've got an idea of my own (concerning that question) but reading different opinions and perspectives is always interesting and can be eye opening (although I swear, mine are open right now, I'm not THAT good around my keyboard) (apologies: I love horrendous humor).

    Here's an objective argument that could at least settle the matter somewhat and get this topic going: of the now many decades of metal we've had, 80's til the 2010's, all the "classics" are very widely considered to be the better albums of the earier decades, not the latest. A legendary monolith of metal is Morbid Angel, Metallica, Iron Maiden, Cannibal Corpse (love em or hate em personally, that's a fact) - NOT Tesseract, Braindrill, or Animals as Leaders. Some would answer they haven't had the time to gain 'legendary status', but I still push the argument I don't think that's what's going to alter the equation, the first batch are clearly legendary, the second (contemporary ones) feel more 'experimental' if anything. Like their experimental prowess is praisable - but not legends. It seems it's quality (older bands) vs experimental/technical exploration (newer).

    What d'ya think ?
     
  2. Bloopy

    Bloopy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    875
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Seems your title should read "what's wrong with modern metal music". The 'scene' refers as much to the behaviour & enthusiasm of fans or how often bands play live etc.

    How quickly an album becomes a classic probably depends on how wide its appeal is and how much competition it has. Technical music tends to have a narrow appeal. Also, technology has levelled the playing field a lot. Making recordings is much cheaper and fans can sift through 100s of new albums in each subgenre every year. It's no longer just a few bands getting signed and reaching mainstream record stores/the radio and having a big chance of achieving a classic.

    I think a classic album is likely to be one that helps cement an emerging subgenre and/or has a wider influence than just within its niche. First examples I'd name from the last 20 years are Sleep - Dopesmoker and Electric Wizard - Dopethrone. They were too heavy for stoner rock but too stoned for doom metal, escalating the need for a 'stoner metal' tag. Any 'modern' subgenres will have their classics, but it's almost impossible to imagine a thrash metal album from 2018 quickly becoming a classic because the genre's been around for so long.
     
  3. Bruticus

    Bruticus Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2014
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    Upyowaaazzzzbeeutchhhhhh
    ^ yeah you're right, *current metal music not 'scene' my bad !

    Well I'd reiterate the argument that older bands were all about song writing quality: you say a classic band is defined by how it can establish a genre, but many bands that did achieve that weren't particularly good musically they were just original at that time and happened to become very influential.
    I could name bands but I don't want to get ppl angry at me ! Instead I'll name bands that were both very original/influential AND really good musically: Morbid Angel. Slayer. It wouldn't have mattered whether they were influential or just fit in an already established scene, because their music was that good they would've stood out anyway. I mean whether "God of Emptiness" came out in 93 as it did, or in 2000 essentially wouldn't have mattered as to how great and unique it is.
     
  4. Bloopy

    Bloopy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    875
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Maybe quality is the wrong word, because the newer experimental/technical stuff you refer to is quality in its own way. The older bands were motivated to write catchy hits or songs you could sing along to. So not necessarily higher quality songwriting, but popular, high quality entertainment.

    I only discovered death metal in 2000 when mp3s came along, and first heard God of Emptiness a few years later on TV. I liked that it was catchy, but it was completely drowning in nu metal and groove metal by that point. It's hard to imagine it would've found quite the same success, even if it deserved it. And if it didn't achieve wide success then they wouldn't be talked up as being legendary by enough people. Even if you do find a band from the 2000s that you personally think should be listed up there with Morbid Angel, not many people will agree with your choice because there are so many other bands and sub-subgenres to appeal to their taste instead.

    I don't think there's anything "wrong" with that. Especially coming from NZ where there were hardly any local metal bands I liked before about 2008. Around that time there was a resurgence of speed/thrash, traditional, and stoner/doom metal. I guess bands also became more mature, got access to better technology and started putting out better quality recordings.
     
  5. Bruticus

    Bruticus Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2014
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    Upyowaaazzzzbeeutchhhhhh
    Quality is the wrong word ? Perhaps. I can't for the life of me though compare in terms of quality, just sheer quality, older bands to the newer ones. I think catchiness is just a natural condition to good music, as a general rule. Even the most twisted, full on chromatic band needs to be coherent enough musically that the riffs carry that natural value to them, and that patented memorable quality. A good musical theme is a memorable one, surely.
    I'm not promoting radio friendly metal, but God of Emptiness for instance is by no means that. I realize it even featured on Beavis n Butthead lol, but eh, I mean it's just really brilliantly written material isn't it.

    But anyways, I'm only here just exposing my own opinion of what's wrong with contemporary metal, whereas I'm looking for outside opinions instead.
     
  6. Bloopy

    Bloopy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    875
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    New Zealand
    My listening is biased towards older bands as well. I often prefer bands' raw early stuff (if the production is ok), and groundbreakers who weren't necessarily that good musically (The Runaways, Plasmatics, Venom etc.). But I'd say that's more due to the attitude and intensity captured. I don't have a musical ear and I see this all as a matter of taste.

    In case it's of any relevance, here are a few of my favourite tracks from the past 10 years or so:
    Razorwyre - Battleshark
    The House Of Capricorn - Coffins & Cloven Hooves
    1989 - Take My Hand

    Admittedly both Razorwyre and 1989 were aiming for a retro sound, but then the more technical and arty bands channel old school influences too.
     
  7. Bruticus

    Bruticus Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2014
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    Upyowaaazzzzbeeutchhhhhh
    I see. Well bias is bias, bias is only bias. Personal preference, stops there. But I'd make plenty of arguments about why the older stuff was easily better, and not because 'I just want it to be', but for actual reasons - but again this isn't about me exposing my own arguments.

    Just basically: music is inspired by the society of its time, and I think there was plenty more positive influence to be tapped into during the past 3-4 decades than the current. It doesn't seem a coincidence (in fact quite the contrary) that not just metal, but everything sucks atm, which of course stirs controversy every time I say that but. There.

    Lsnd to your first two (third didn't work). Not my thing personally. Although I would tell you it still had more character and genuinness than anything I hear nowadays if I'm perfectly honest !
     

Share This Page