This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.

Welcome to Our Community

Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.

Where do you stand on split bands with the same name?

Discussion in 'ProgPower USA' started by LordCarlos, Dec 4, 2015.

  1. LordCarlos

    LordCarlos Rock/Metal Warrior

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2015
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    I'm particularly curious about Rhapsody and Queensryche....
     
  2. The Invisible Guest

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2002
    Messages:
    2,671
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I'd rather bands that split up pick new band names, but in Queensryche's case the name is worth a lot of money .. too much so to walk away from.


    Britt
     
  3. CrimsonEmotions

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2007
    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I absolutely despise that trend. Obviously, money is the issue, as Queensryche is far more likely to sell tickets than Operation Mindcrime. But it gets pretty ridiculous at times, especially when the bands start releasing albums under the contested name. In addition to the ones you mentioned, there have also been various iterations of Ratt, Great White and LA Guns.

    Even without a contentious breakup and a battle over the name, there are still several bands that are the original band in name only, sometimes retaining only a single member. Foreigner is pretty much an all new Foreigner cover band with Mick Jones still playing with them (at least for half the set). In the 1980's YES had an entirely different sound with members from various iterations of the group. And of course we all know about the 2000's iteration of Guns & Roses.

    But the question then ends up being at what extent having a single member justifies continuing the name, especially if that member is the creative force behind the band. Megadeth IS Dave Mustaine---Iced Earth IS Jon Schafer, and WASP IS Blackie Lawless. Could you say the same thing about GNR and Axl Rose? Or is GNR not really GNR without Slash?
     
  4. VenomGA

    VenomGA At War With Stan

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2005
    Messages:
    4,222
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    OK but in your example there is a flaw, Megadeth has 2 original members still...both Dave's.

    My thing is usually who ever has the singer is the one I will see. Anyone can play the music, but the singer is the "voice" of the band...unless you can;t sing anymore like David Lee Roth, Stephen Pearcy, etc
     

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Our music community has been around for almost 15 years and we pride ourselves on offering great metal music discussion, as well as music production and other closely related topics. We work hard every day to make sure our community is one of the best. Enjoy!
  • Like us on Facebook

  • Donate ♥

    We have worked hard for 15 years (and running) to make sure our Metal community is running fast, uses the best software, and isn't overloaded with advertising. If you love the forum as much as we love bringing it to you, please show your support with a generous donation. We really appreciate it!