This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.

Welcome to Our Community

Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.

How To Refute Flat Earth Lies

Discussion in 'The Philosopher' started by FEZZILLA, Jul 25, 2018.

  1. Master_Yoda77

    Master_Yoda77 Juggalo

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2008
    Messages:
    13,610
    Likes Received:
    3,147
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Chicago, Illinois
    I wish, that thing is sick.
     
    CiG likes this.
  2. FEZZILLA

    FEZZILLA Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2003
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    America
    I have debated so many of these "Christians" who claim the Bible teaches flat earth. I have yet to find one of them who is even a real Christian. They are atheists out to impugn the Scriptures in a whole new radical way. Just the other day, after church, I took the kids that were with me on a little field trip. We stopped in the parking lot of a Satanic Church. This used to be a real Christian church where they worshiped the true God. But then the church was infiltrated by progressives and now there are rainbow flags all over the church and progressive slogans everywhere. This is a church of complete blasphemy but it still pretends to be a Christian church which is common practice in the occult to do. So the kids got a lesson of what happens to a church once its infiltrated by occultists. We attend an ancient church which holds to all ancient beliefs and traditions that are all traced back to the Apostles. None of these progressive rainbow cults can do that. That being said, these flat earth "Christians" generally are atheists or occultists masquerading as Christians to make all Christians look stupid and totally out of touch with reality. I'm sure there are a few gullible Christians out there who have fallen for the scam. Perhaps the photo captures such a gullible Christians who is in the stages of being slowly transformed into a Satanist through the flat earth deception. I've seen this happen many times and know how the occult operates.
     
  3. FEZZILLA

    FEZZILLA Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2003
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    America
    Refuting Liberal Professors who Lie About The Bible


    Contextual Application: chûwg, mᵉchûwgâh, têbêl, dûwr (also machabath & tachath)

    Here is a lesson on how to read a lexicon. I am going to post five pics of word definitions using the Strong's number system. Now when you read these keep in mind they are defined by the same Hebrew scholar. But note that not every word is used to describe the shape of the earth.

    Process of Elimination: Which words and verses do not fit the context of the earth and it's shape?

    1.

    2.

    3.
    4.

    5.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Summary:


    1. Strong's H4230 mᵉchûwgâh is used only 1x and was not used to describe the shape of the earth or the earth at all.

    2. Strong's H2328 chûwg is used 1x to describe the earth.

    3. Strong's H2329 chûwg is used 3x but only 1x to describe the entire earth, with the other two verses used to describe the arch or vault (curvature) of the sky.

    4. Strong's H8398 têbêl is used 36x and 10x to describe the fullness of the earth and its inhabitants. I only used 3 examples out of 10 here to keep it simple and easy.

    5. Strong's H1754 dûwr (aka, dur) is used 3x and never to describe the earth

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Conclusion:

    Hebrew is the context driven language. Neither H4230 mᵉchûwgâh or H1754 dûwr are ever used once to describe the earth. Together they make up 4 verses in the entire Bible. If these words were supposed to be used to describe the earth then they would of been used at least 1x out of 4 to do so.
    But you will noticed how H2328--H2329 chûwg and H8398 têbêl share the same contextual application with only minor differences in overall usage. But when applied to the earth they both describe an earth which is compassing, round, circular, full, abiding by the boundary of light and darkness as we would expect from a spherical earth. The Tyndale influenced Bibles translate têbêl as "round world" or "round compass" or "whole compass of the world." These renderings give meaning to H2328 and a compassing world at the boundary of light and darkness (a globe). But têbêl & chûwg also share similar context in verses like Isaiah 40:22, Jeremiah 10:12 and Jeremiah 51:14 as the following check list shows:

    "round world" (Jer.51:15) "circle of the earth" (Isaiah 40:22) and "whole compass of the world (Jer.10:12).

    "spread out the heavens" (Isaiah 40:22; Jer.10:12, 51:15).

    Isaiah 40:22 shares another characteristic with Proverbs 8:31,

    "circle of the earth" (Isa.40:22); "round compass of his world" -- in both cases the earth is the Lord's and attributed to His Dominion and Rule from creation.

    "inhabitants of the world" (Isa.40:22), "children of men" (Prov.8:31).

    So the connection between the shape of the earth, the spreading out of the heavens, and the inhabitants therein (Ps.89:11), are clearly seen. TWOT even goes further to define têbêl,

    TWOT 835h תֵּבֵל têbêl: "First, the noun is employed to represent the global mass called earth."
    And again it says: "In several passages the sense of têbêl as the globular earth in combination with its inhabitants is clearly observed."

    So both têbêl and chûwg share common application.

    So why not use H4230 mᵉchûwgâh or H1754 dûwr?
    Well the answer is pretty obvious that they are not good word choices which explains why Isaiah used neither word in Isa.40:22.

    Gesenius' Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon does not contradict meaning. H2328 does not mean 2D flat circle while H2329 means globe. That is not how these definitions were meant to be understood. They both teach a 3D circle that compasses around at the boundary of day and night.

    2000 years of theology can't go wrong.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    APPENDIX: My Challenge To Flat Earthers

    Why didn’t Isaiah use the Hebrew word “machabath” (Strong’s H4227)?

    The New Strong’s Expanded Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible,

    TWOT 600b:
    https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?t=nasb&strongs=h4227

    So why can’t they find the right word which better describes their flat plate model of the earth they designed for the Biblical view of the earth? Surely this word would have been better than chuwg? It could have been translated “...the pan of the earth” or “the griddle of the earth" or "the plate of the earth." But it wasn't. There is another word which means flat.

    Strong’s H8478 is found in Joshua 6:5, 20; which is the Hebrew word tachath which was used to describe the walls of Jericho “that the wall fell down flat “ (Joshua 6:20). The word translated flat is tachath.
    https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang...&strongs=h8478

    So why wasn’t another Hebrew word which means flat used in Isaiah 40:22? Why couldn’t the verse just literally translate “the flatness of the earth”? Surely if the earth was flat and plate shaped Isaiah would have used the right word to communicate that message. The word translated circle does not mean flat as the earth is circular in shape. The definition of round carries a broad meaning in English.

    Conclusion. If Isaiah wanted to use dur (Strong's H1754) instead of chuwg he would have. When we go into the Gesenius' Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon we may see the reason why Isaiah chose chuwg over dur.

    Here is the Gesenius' definition of dur
    https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?t=kjv&strongs=h1754


    Here is the Gesenius' definition of chuwg
    https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?t=kjv&strongs=h2329


    The word chuwg means circle, sphere which is a 3D circle. The word also means compass which is what a 3D circle does.
    https://wikidiff.com/compass/encompass

    The English word "compass" applied to the shape of the earth.

    Proverbs 8:31,

    Proverbs 8:31 uses the Hebrew word תֵּבֵל têbêl which is also used to describe the shape of the earth which, like חוּג chûwg, means the compassing fullness of the globe.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Gesenius' Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon:


    H2328 chûwg
    H2328.gif

    H2329 chûwg
    H2329.gif

    H4230 mᵉchûwgâh
    Isaiah 44.gif

    H1754 dûwr
    dur.gif

    H8398 têbêl
    tebel.gif
     
  4. Blurry_Dreams

    Blurry_Dreams Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2018
    Messages:
    4,392
    Likes Received:
    407
    Trophy Points:
    83
  5. Blurry_Dreams

    Blurry_Dreams Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2018
    Messages:
    4,392
    Likes Received:
    407
    Trophy Points:
    83
  6. FEZZILLA

    FEZZILLA Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2003
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    America
  7. Blurry_Dreams

    Blurry_Dreams Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2018
    Messages:
    4,392
    Likes Received:
    407
    Trophy Points:
    83
    kinda amazed this thread exists
    was there really any real-life people that still thought the earth was flat in 2018??
     
  8. FEZZILLA

    FEZZILLA Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2003
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    America
    I've posted many other post on this topic which are not all shared on this page. All posts refuting flat earth scams on the Bible are found on my FB page. I will share one more important work for those who may be interested.

    Fight the flat earth!


    :D:tickled: ...I love that song:rofl: ;)
     

    Attached Files:

    • 1.jpg
      1.jpg
      File size:
      33.6 KB
      Views:
      1
  9. Slammed

    Slammed Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2017
    Messages:
    26,696
    Likes Received:
    36,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I for one am thankful you haven't shared everything, I'd like to think we can save some pearls of wisdom for next year.
     
    FEZZILLA and CiG like this.
  10. FEZZILLA

    FEZZILLA Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2003
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    America
    What Is The Firmament?

    Contents:
    1. Definitions.
    2. Scripture Mentions More Than One Heaven.
    3. Is There A Sky Made Out Of Metal?
    4. St. John of Damascus (676 - 749 A.D) -- On The Heavens.
    5. Isaiah 40:22
    6. The Conclusion of the Matter

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. Definitions

    The firmament has become an unhealthy obsession with flat earthers who simply are not interested in what the firmament actually means. So they have forcefully made up their own body of theology around the firmament which has become the beating heart of the flat earth movement. So here we will learn what the firmament is and why flat earthers are, once again, on the losing side of the debate.

    The first mentioned of the firmament (H7549. רָקִיעַ râqîyaʻ), is found in Genesis 1:6 in the KJV, which says:

    Before we go on any further we need to know the definition of “firmament”?

    Firmament/Expanse from The New Strong's Expanded Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible:

    Flat earthers try to assign such a literal meaning to the firmament as to claim Genesis 1:8 is speaking about a solid, hard, metal dome that cannot ever be penetrated by anything--not anything coming from space to earth, or anything from the earth leaving for space. Flat earthers want us to literally believe the Bible is teaching us about a sky literally made out of metal or glass or some solid structure. But as you can see there is no dome. Though our Lord Jesus did say this about the fall of Lucifer:

    So Satan fell from heaven. But what is heaven? Is Jesus speaking about Strong’s H8064 שָׁמַיִם shâmayim or Strong’s G3772 οὐρανός ? Jesus is in fact speaking about Strong’s G3772 which is so surprisingly well defined that you will have no problem following it. Here is the Greek definition of οὐρανός, used in Luke 10:18 as “heaven,”

    The New Strong’s Expanded Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible,

    So οὐρανός means heaven (singular, as sky) and heavens (plural, as in the heavens beyond the earthly sky). Eph 4:10 says how Jesus ascended beyond the heavens:

    So Jesus left the earth while Lucifer entered it. This does not appear to be an impenetrable sky made of metal.

    But is there more than one heaven/expanse?

    Hebrew Definition of heaven/heavens defined in The New Strong's Expanded Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible:

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Scripture Mentions More Than One Heaven.

    There are three heavens:

    1. The Atmospheric Heaven - The First Heaven

    Both NKJV and MEV both refer to the earthly heaven--the sky and atmosphere of the earth.

    2. The Celestial Heaven - The Second Heaven

    3. Heaven As The Home Of God - The Third Heaven

    As anyone can clearly read, there is more than one heaven.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. Is There A Sky Made Out Of Metal?

    Flat earthers always cite from Elihu’s narrative in Job 37:18,

    Putting away the question of whether Elihu’s narration is relevant to us or not, it would be wise to see what is actually meant by a sky as strong as metal.

    The early church fathers also described the firmament as strong and solid. St.Ambrose, a prominent 4th century church father, says this about the firmament:

    St.Ambrose does not deny that God made the firmament of a solid nature. He, as well as some other church fathers, agree the firmament is solid. None of the early church fathers were scientists, but they did understand word definitions very well. It should also be noted that Bishop Ambrose was overwhelmingly convinced that the Bible taught globe earth. He also believed that the heavens (i.e., space) was so large that we will never fully understand it. So the flat earth view that the firmament is flat is not supported by any ancient Christian leaders.

    Strong’s H2389 חָזָק châzâq from the word “strong” used in Job 37:18,

    So Strong’s H2389 חָזָק châzâq is applied to anything that is firm, strong, such as the prophet’s face and forehead, and, the firmament (the atmosphere of earth). We can very clearly see that châzâq is an expression which simply means “strong” with a slight exaggeration of emphasis. For example: Was the prophet’s face literally a rock? Was the prophet’s forehead really harder than flint? These are mere comparisons of the strong character of the prophet. Likewise we know the firmament is strong, seemingly impenetrable. We can tell just from reading Elihu’s narrative that the firmness of the firmament was something discussed but its actual nature was uncertain to mankind until the 20th century. The proof is right there in Elihu’s narrative, once again, in Job 37:18. I’ll quote from some older translations predating the 20th century.

    So we have:

    1. “which are most strong, as if they were of molten brass”
    2. “which is strong, and as a molten looking glass?”
    3. “which is to loke vpon, as it were cast of cleare metall?”
    4. “which are strong and bright as a loking glasse”

    Elihu is expressing the clarity and strength of the firmament in general relationship to God’s handiwork of creation (e.g. Psalm 19:1). We see many expressions in the Bible from a human perspective which attempt to describe something. In Exodus 24:9-10 the Israelites see God (or what God reveals of Himself) and give this description:

    This is a similar description of the firmament but coming from a human perspective. What did not come from a strict human perspective is the actual account itself. The Israelites really did see God. But they gave their own description based on the knowledge and the vocabulary to express that knowledge. If you saw God you would likewise provide a description which you would draw from the best of your knowledge in the vocabulary of that knowledge. Likewise the firmament is written in Genesis and Jews and Christians are trying to describe what it means based on what is written about it. The account is genuine but attempts to understand it are never flawless. With that said, the early church fathers understood what the word meant but did not fully grasp its nature in relation to our knowledge of modern science.

    Flavius Josephus (37-100 A.D. was a Jewish historian who wrote the Antiquity of the Jews in 70 A.D. He gives an account of the firmament without attempting to go into depth to explain it.

    Josephus knew God created the firmament but he also knows he doesn’t have the knowledge to explain it in great depth so he provides only what he knew about it.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. St. John of Damascus (676 - 749 A.D) -- On The Heavens

    St.John of Damascus lived in the late 7th century up through the mid 8th century. He gave us the first Christian writing about Islam, which he called them by the name “Ishmaelites” from where their leader descended. He described the Ishmaelites as being the forerunners of the Antichrist.
    St.John was also an Eastern Church father; which, at this time in Christian history, there was no division between Eastern and Western Orthodoxy. There is still only one universal Christian Church at this point in time. He goes into greater depth in providing us the meaning of the heavens. He doesn’t deviate a bit from the Strong’s definition. Remember, you are not reading the words of a scientist. Nobody should expect any of these church fathers to know anything about science.

    There are three important things we can confirm here: (1) There is more than one heaven (2) the exact nature of the firmament was not fully understood and very well discussed. There was no dogmatic view concerning the exact nature of the firmament. But as for the spherical shape of the earth and its rotation, that had been very well understood from a simple reading and understanding of Hebrew words which even today are understood to mean a 3D circular earth--a globe. (3) Pagans did borrow from Moses (i.e., the Torah which is called the Books of Moses, who compiled the Torah of God).

    St.John continues to explain the heavens from Scripture:

    What St.John of Damascus is saying is something we already read in the Strong’s Concordance. It would be easier just to accept the Hebrew definition from the Strong’s. But since there is so much squabble about the nature of the firmament, and liberal scholars (i.e., pseudo-scholars) are trying hard to redefine Hebrew words so as to get a Democrat elected in 2020, it forces Christians like me to reexplain what has already been explained in the Strong’s.

    So a clear reading of St.John’s explanation proves that Gen.1:17 is God placing the sun, moon and stars in the heavens--the second heavens beyond our early firmament. In other words: Space!

    The real problem is that too many people don’t realize that the KJV is outdated. Don’t get me wrong here, I’m not saying the KJV mistranslated Genesis chapter one. The people of the 17th century all understood that Gen.1:17 was God placing the sun, moon and stars in the heavens (i.e., the greater expanse of space). Though people here in the 21st century, in an age where illiteracy is the highest in centuries: there are words, expressions, even grammatical rules, that no longer carry the same meaning or grammatical rules of today’s 21st century English speaking people. This is why there are modern translations such as the MEV and NKJV. There is no difference in the meaning of verses in Genesis chapter one from the KJV, MEV, NKJV or RSV. The only thing that differs from the translations mentioned is the grammatical rules. There actually was not set standard of English back in the early 17th century. But today, we have set rules and we read literature and understand it from our modern grammar. So when people read:

    They are reading the 17th century grammar which means:
    Both translations mean the exact same thing as St.John of Damascus clearly pointed out.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    5. Isaiah 40:22

    This is a verse we have read and discussed multiple times. But many are asking: What is the tent? This tent is our atmosphere. And like a tent, it keeps us safe from solar flares and objects from space. Our planet was not poorly made. God knew what He was doing.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    6. The Conclusion of the Matter

    So from all that is shared here about the firmament, how can we 21st century people understand it? The firmament/expanse of the earthly heaven is in no way like metal. It much more solid than metal! This is true! Our earthly heaven is much more solid than iron or metal. This is scientifically proven, too. Indeed, when meteorites enter into our atmosphere what happens to them? They burn up! Yet are not meteorites a solid structure like large rocks we see on earth? Sure they are. And still they burn up into nothing. It takes a very large asteroid to make through the firmament to impact the earth.
    But what about metal? Surely the firmament is much weaker than metal, right? Absolutely not! In 2003, space shuttle Columbia blow up reentering our atmosphere, killing all seven astronauts on board. The metal of the space shuttle was not stronger than the firmament. It takes a great deal of knowledge to leave earth and reenter the atmosphere of the planet. This knowledge of physics was not know until the 20th century. If all precautions are not properly carried out, a space shuttle meets the same fate as a meteorite. In order to be an astronaut, a person must have a great deal of knowledge in physics before they can ever pilot any space craft. So the firmament is solid, yet its just flexible enough to allow a smart astronaut to and from space.

    Is the firmament clear like glass? Just look at the photo attached to this article and you’ll see its like looking through a window. Though if you throw a rock from a space shuttle to earth the rock will not break the glass-like window of the firmament, but will burn up in mere seconds, never hitting anyone on earth or damaging someone’s car. So in conclusion the firmament is solid, strong, capable of keeping the earth safe from cosmic threats that would have wiped us out long ago had our atmosphere not been created so...strong.

    1.jpg
     
  11. FEZZILLA

    FEZZILLA Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2003
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    America
    I don't always have the time to drop in on this forum and post this stuff. Though my reasoning for posting all this is to help people better understand the Bible. So much skepticism with such little understanding. We live in an age where people love lies and shun truth. This is a dangerous place for us to be as a nation. I'm not sure if people actually understand that with complete anarchy and chaos comes a mass die-off of people who die for various reason. If people cannot learn how to be civil once again and to embrace logical thinking skills, we will soon perish as a nation and there is not one of us here who is going to enjoy the collapse of our nation.

    Attacking the Bible is something that leads to the deaths of millions of Americans. How so? Well this requires the ability to grasp the moral logic of our Declaration of Independence, our Constitution and Bill of Rights. The Holy Bible was the first Book that was brought over by the Mayflower pilgrims. From this point, the Bible because the moral foundation of our entire virtue of law. Modern civilization was established on true Biblical principles. America was not founded a Christian only nation, but our laws were. Gradually, in time, our young nation grew to maturity and many great leaps of civility were accomplished. Slavery, for example, was abolished by William Wilberforce, who's sermons from the Bible abolished slavery on both continents.

    But somehow, a new spoiled generation would emerge in the late 60s who would despise all the freedoms their parents and ancestors fought to preserve. This spoiled generation would further spoil the next until we reached the present now where we are nearly at the brink of another civil war. All this because spoiled brats are so self-centered they don't want nothing to do with accountability and the Bible teaches that we are all accountable to God for our sins. So there has been so much hatred for God and His faithful that these so-called "new atheists" (who are all actually Satanists), will pretend to be Christians, infiltrate seminaries, and teach evolution in a subtle (Gen.3:1) and malicious way. As a result of the Obama years, many liberal scholars were successful in infiltrating countless seminaries. They would then manipulate and twist the Bible for political gain (as it is all just politics to them). Thus the flat earth lie comes from apostate scholars whom I am making an example of, and unapologetically so. And when such malicious deeds are done in holy places, this is where I come in. When I start dismantling a lie I completely and thoroughly refute it. All I have in my life is God. I am dead to the world but alive in Christ. I beat up the bully who is bullying the baby Christian. Since little children are all liberal professors can pick on, I make sure they get adult contact. So if it takes lie after lie after lie to defend the ancient myth of evolution, what does that say? If atheists have to become Satanists and infiltrate churches and seminaries, what does that say about atheism?

    So my goal is to win back the lost and deceived by presenting them with the unadulterated truth of the Gospel. I will post one more post here about Faith, Hope, Love.
     
  12. Slammed

    Slammed Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2017
    Messages:
    26,696
    Likes Received:
    36,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    TL;DR

    Old school hooker names but feel free to post their picture so we can all see them
     
  13. FEZZILLA

    FEZZILLA Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2003
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    America
    There is something wrong or missing from your soul if all you can think when you hear the words Faith, Hope and Love is hookers.
     
  14. CiG

    CiG So Long Suckers!

    Joined:
    May 22, 2015
    Messages:
    44,293
    Likes Received:
    23,499
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    W.A.
    Or something missing from your sense of humour...
     
  15. FEZZILLA

    FEZZILLA Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2003
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    America
    Lets hope that is the case here ;)
     
  16. Slammed

    Slammed Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2017
    Messages:
    26,696
    Likes Received:
    36,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Pfft there is nothing wrong with my soul. I was saved. I saw the light. I visit the church regularly. I am a follower. I believe!!!
    My Church
     
    CiG likes this.
  17. FEZZILLA

    FEZZILLA Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2003
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    America
    Metal music should be set aside as entertainment and not a god to worship. For metal music has no power to save your soul. If Christ is not risen, the we all die eternally. How, then, can metal save your soul when you still die eternally? Some people go overboard on something to the point where its becomes a spiritual barrier between them and God. I've been there myself. But there must come a time when we separate entertainment from true worship. There is only one God and one way to eternal life which is through Christ. Neither of us know for certain when we'll die. But when you die you will not want to be in hell, especially when Jesus has offered you eternal life.
     
  18. Slammed

    Slammed Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2017
    Messages:
    26,696
    Likes Received:
    36,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Jesus offered me eternal life?
    Fuck it! My postman must be a real cunt because I didn't get the invite.
     
  19. Blurry_Dreams

    Blurry_Dreams Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2018
    Messages:
    4,392
    Likes Received:
    407
    Trophy Points:
    83
    instead of actually reading this 3rd page right now [i'll get to it later] i'm just laughing my effing ass off at the phrase "sky made of metal"
     
  20. FEZZILLA

    FEZZILLA Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2003
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    America
    As I point out in the article, flat earthers completely, and most likely deliberately, misinterpret the firmament. They claim to deny the existence of space. The proper exegesis of Genesis very strongly disagrees with their radical belief.
     

Share This Page