There is a heated debate going on over this photograph taken by a deviantArt member. The photo in question: http://www.deviantart.com/view/23066589/ Quite a photo, if I may say so. Well, it ended up here: Now, many people are saying that it's lazy to use stock photography. I disagree. I am very artistic and would probably be a good photographer, but I lack the equipment necessary to be a photographer. So I use stock photography quite often. Geoff, who designed the artwork for Synchestra, did multiple covers and Devin like this the best. Very little was changed as you can see. So is Geoff somehow a lazy artist? I view stock photography like I view sampling in music. It's a part of music, a part of art. I have no issues with it. What are your thoughts? Have you, or do you, Travis, use stock photography?