The man that invented the first IQ test said himself that he doesn't really believe that you can accurately measure a person's intelligence. These tests don't take into account many different factors including musical ability, leadership skills, wit, ability to work under pressure (unless maybe it's timed), so on and so forth. A few of the better ones might measure creativity but only to a very small degree. Having said all that, I got a 129 when I took one once. Bah, pointless.
Haha, I only got 90, but I didn't know it was timed so I left the room and I didn't get to do the last 11 questions.
87 for me..i guess i don't answer questions correctly i don't want to answer lol, i hate tests, but in general i guess i have a high IQ.
the best IQ-test i ever made was one that had more questions than you could answer in a week or smth and when you closed the window a new one popped up with a message like 'wow, you wasted like x hours here, your IQ is y' and the higher x was, the lower was y... edit: this one is quite cool too: http://crux.baker.edu/cdavis09/roses.html it'S not an IQ-test but pretty funny anyway....ppl who solved the problem don't post how it works here. instructions are right on the side. it took me like 40 minutes to find out how it works. i've seen ppl solving it in 1 minutes and others trying for a week or smth...
Your response is pointless; this response is pointless. Yes, it's a shame everything is so pointless.
i love how 95% of the posters in this thread have alleged "130-140" IQs, yet i can count on one hand, the number of times ive read something truly extraordinary on this forum. no offense to any one individual...but it just seems odd.
