You are. Statements from the accuser and the accused, if they have been given, are entered and treated as evidence, just as other eyewitness testimony is. It's not abstract at all. The psychological and quality-of-life costs for the victims of sexually predatory behavior are well-documented. We know from survey after survey that the fear of not being believed or being re-victimized socially is the number one reason that most victims never report. We know that people who engage in sexual predation frequently do so serially. These aren't abstractions, they're real harms visited on real people. Weighed against the much smaller (and largely theoretical) ranks of the falsely accused, who suffer harm of a comparatively trivial level, it absolutely is the path of least harm to give the benefit of the doubt to accusers in the absence of other evidence. I think you're afraid that a scene that was really inclusive of everyone, and not just the bitter white dudes that have traditionally been centered in metal, would not be particularly welcoming to your brand of coy edgelord cryptofascism. But like you said. We're done.