There is no reason to expect that blue eyes would be selected by GE, unless blue eyes are the most attractive eye color cross-culturally. I have seen no evidence of this being the case.
the blue-eyes thing (or something else that's equally vapid) could happen with majority of geniticaly engineered babies if only a limited population of Earth had capability of genetically engineering their children
There is, however, reason to believe that certain characteristics, such neotenous facial features and .7 WHR, are attractive cross-culturally, therefore, we would expect them to predominate if GE become frequently used.
this is assuming that GE would become a global ability, which it prolly won't
I agree with James Watson when he said that some people think it would be bad if all girls were beautiful
the "if all girls looked beautiful" quote was him saying that if everyone on Earth looked identical, then looking at people would become boring because the sameness of human appearance would become repetative to a monotonous degree, "variety is the spice of life" could be aplicable to human appearance, it would be boring and confusing if everyone looked identical, right? However, with that said, I am much more concerned with factors such as g(what IQ tests mostly measure; there is 20% noise on the RAPM) than wast/hip ratio.
i didn't understand this last part