Stilling your extreme hunger vs clenching your extreme thirst

Yeah


  • Total voters
    25
Hunger by an infinite margin. For those who have ever been in a situation where you have plenty of water but no food know how nice it is to eat a meal compared to taking a swig of water.
 
I'd place more importance on hunger for sure, but quenching your thirst has the instant satisfaction that you don't get as much with satisfying your hunger. If it ever came down to it, I'd just eat some fruit or something that gives you both.
 

fry%20i%20see%20what%20you%20did%20there.jpg
 
Thirst.

Basically, if you stop eating and drinking at the same time, you're going to need a drink of water way before you need food. And at that point, a drink would taste/be infinitely better.
 
Just woke up slightly hungover, so I'm currently suffering from both. I'll satisfy both in a bit and report on which was more pleasurable.