The role and impact of producers on metal bands

batmura

Sea of Tranquility
Nov 1, 2001
2,828
4
38
www.seaoftranquility.org
How big do you think is the role and impact of a producer is on a metal band? Do you care who your favourite bands hire for the production or mixing job on their upcoming album? Do you feel a certain producer could get better results than another? What do you think of bands, after working with a producer and achieving a certain degree of success, deciding to handle the production duties on their own?

I was reading a post by established producer Michael Wagener who has worked with bands as diverse as Skid Row, Metallica, King's X, and White Lion. He was commenting on his work with Extreme and his contribution to their best-selling album, Pornograffiti.

Anyway, when producing a band, psychology is a big part of getting great results out of musicians. Some are very open minded and you can make suggestions about musical changes or ideas and they will pick it up and make it their own. Others don't want a lot of ouside influences, because they are scared it would take away from their creativity or credit. In those cases, if you want to achieve a certain result, you have to plant a "creative seed" which, in a few days will turn into the result you are looking for, but it still seems like it was all the idea of the musician him/herself. The downside, of course is, that the musician looks at it as if he did ALL the work and the producer "didn't really do anything". The logical next step for those kind of musicians is to produce their next album themselves, their ego telling them they don't need a producer and, like in the above mentioned case, they might fall flat on their face, and come up with an album that doesn't sell anywhere near what the previous one did.

In terms of the record "beeing done before it was recorded" Nuno is probably referring to the writing of it. It is true that on Pornograffitty we didn't need a lot of pre-production, because the material was very good and very well written, but so was the material on "3-sides to every story", which Nuno produced himself and didn't sell a tenth of what Porno did. A couple of the demos actually made the final album (like "When I First Kissed You") and on one song (can't remember which one) we even kept a drumtrack from a demo and built up on that. So the demos were really well done, maybe that's what Nuno was refferring to, but it still was a lot of work (some obvious, some not so obvious to him) to put the record together.

In any case, the combination producer/band turned out a great album, which seemingly couldn't quite be repeated on later records. In this business egos can be wonderful, but they also can be a curse.​

I thought this was an interesting read. A similar point was made by Slipknot with regard to Rick Rubin:

"There are some people who would love for me to toe the party line, which is basically, 'Working with Rick Rubin was a very enriching experience,'" he said. "Let me give you the fucking truth of it: Rick Rubin showed up for 45 minutes a week. Rick Rubin would then, during that 45 minutes, lay on a couch and have a mic brought in next to [his] face so he wouldn't have to move."

Taylor went on to add:

The Rick Rubin of today is a thin, thin, thin shadow of the Rick Rubin that he was. He is overrated, he is overpaid, and I will never work with him again as long as I live.​

Rubin's response was actually similar to that of Wagener, as attested by other Slipknot members. They said his presence eased up the tension and changed the psychology of the band, giving them the chance to bring out the best in them.
 
The definition of "producer" is often one that has changed over the years.


The guy who coaches bands throughout the writing process and directs the overall tone and style of a record and got paid a truckload of money to do that is a long gone breed, and is not in any way shape or form a present day "producer". Rick Rubin is one of the few people who still does this, because he has the name for it. Because he doesn't do his own engineering anymore, I consider him a hack.

Producers these days, are mainly engineers. People who record bands, and will often times also mix and master them as well. In this regard, the choice of producer on a record can define a record. Just, in a different way from the 70's and 80's where a "producer" was also heavily involved in the writing process. Nowadays, producers are solely involved on the technical side of the production.
 
I think the shining example of how a producer can make or break a record is Mutt Lange. Love his work or hate it, you can't deny that he's been a massively successful producer, responsible for such diverse (and hugely successful) CDs as:

AC/DC - Back in Black
AC/DC - For Those About To Rock
AC/DC - Highway to Hell
Def Leppard - High 'N Dry
Def Leppard - Pyromania
Def Leppard - Hysteria
The Cars - Heartbeat City
Billy Ocean - Tear Down These Walls
Shania Twain - Come On Over
Shania Twain - The Woman In Me
Nickelback - Dark Horse
Maroon 5 - Hands All Over
Bryan Adams - Waking Up The Neighbors
Foreigner - 4

For most of these artists, the above were the ONLY things he produced for them….they were also (in most cases) the most successful record(s) they ever released. Coincidence? Probably not.

Do all producers have this sort of impact? Of course not, and as AeonicSlumber said, the role seems to have changed a lot in more recent years. For some bands, that's probably a good thing, so they can get it released as they intended. Other bands clearly NEED more guidance and constructive input.

Craig
 
Well.. with Extreme, I would think the general decline of popularity of that type of rock music at the time had more to do with lower sales for 3 Sides album than anything else. It's disingenuous of the producer to imply otherwise.
 
Kelly Gray. Enemies of Reality. Nuff Said?

I was going to bring that one up, myself. When my car got broken into and I had to replace a bunch of CDs...I made sure to replace that one with the Sneap version. Infinitely better.
 
Neil Kernon, aka Auslander, has posted on the Braveboard (and other forums too) for years. There's an ongoing thread over there that was fairly recently started, and he addresses that (and a lot more).
http://bb.bravewords.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=145774
Thanks! This was an excellent, very informative read. Especially the part where Neil talks about coaching the bands along in the studio.
 
How big do you think is the role and impact of a producer is on a metal band? Do you care who your favourite bands hire for the production or mixing job on their upcoming album? Do you feel a certain producer could get better results than another? What do you think of bands, after working with a producer and achieving a certain degree of success, deciding to handle the production duties on their own?

This is a great post, although a long and tough read. My personal opinion is that it simply depends on the band and situation.

I will simply go over the production of my two favorite bands in the world and the way that they do it. Both bands have some of the finest production I have ever heard, but achieve it in different ways.

First...... Vanden Plas...... they are self produced. Markus Teske (keyboardist of Red Circuit) is their Engineer and has recorded them in his studio, but he is more of a technician for them than anything else. Not to make light of what he does for their sound, but I think the band themselves and more likely Gunter has the biggest impact on their sound than anyone else.

Second is Accept. While Accept might not be as big of a name as say "Metallica" or blah blah blah....... they have enough of a history that they wanted to bring that classic "Accept sound" into the 21st Century. They brought in Andy Sneap and he achieved it in spades.

Those are my two favorite bands in the world and it is NO small part because of the production on their releases, yet they achieved the outstanding production very differently.

Bryant