US v Ebony (Gibson)

iekobrid

Authorized XSr™ Dealer
Feb 2, 2006
1,134
0
36
Doogie Howser, MD
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904787404576530520471223268.html


' Federal agents swooped in on Gibson Guitar Wednesday, raiding factories and offices in Memphis and Nashville, seizing several pallets of wood, electronic files and guitars. The Feds are keeping mum, but in a statement yesterday Gibson's chairman and CEO, Henry Juszkiewicz, defended his company's manufacturing policies, accusing the Justice Department of bullying the company. "The wood the government seized Wednesday is from a Forest Stewardship Council certified supplier," he said, suggesting the Feds are using the aggressive enforcement of overly broad laws to make the company cry uncle.

It isn't the first time that agents of the Fish and Wildlife Service have come knocking at the storied maker of such iconic instruments as the Les Paul electric guitar, the J-160E acoustic-electric John Lennon played, and essential jazz-boxes such as Charlie Christian's ES-150. In 2009 the Feds seized several guitars and pallets of wood from a Gibson factory, and both sides have been wrangling over the goods in a case with the delightful name "United States of America v. Ebony Wood in Various Forms." '


WK-AY969_FELDEN_G_20110825173428.jpg



' The tangled intersection of international laws is enforced through a thicket of paperwork. Recent revisions to 1900's Lacey Act require that anyone crossing the U.S. border declare every bit of flora or fauna being brought into the country. One is under "strict liability" to fill out the paperwork—and without any mistakes.

It's not enough to know that the body of your old guitar is made of spruce and maple: What's the bridge made of? If it's ebony, do you have the paperwork to show when and where that wood was harvested and when and where it was made into a bridge? Is the nut holding the strings at the guitar's headstock bone, or could it be ivory? "Even if you have no knowledge—despite Herculean efforts to obtain it—that some piece of your guitar, no matter how small, was obtained illegally, you lose your guitar forever," Prof. Thomas has written. "Oh, and you'll be fined $250 for that false (or missing) information in your Lacey Act Import Declaration."

Consider the recent experience of Pascal Vieillard, whose Atlanta-area company, A-440 Pianos, imported several antique Bösendorfers. Mr. Vieillard asked officials at the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species how to fill out the correct paperwork—which simply encouraged them to alert U.S. Customs to give his shipment added scrutiny.

There was never any question that the instruments were old enough to have grandfathered ivory keys. But Mr. Vieillard didn't have his paperwork straight when two-dozen federal agents came calling.

Facing criminal charges that might have put him in prison for years, Mr. Vieillard pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor count of violating the Lacey Act, and was handed a $17,500 fine and three years probation. '
 
However if you look at it rationally, no other manufacturer in the US has been repeatedly raided and shut down. I'm at least willing to entertain the possibility that Gibson are cheap and willing to cut corners using questionable suppliers of exotic woods to maximize profit. It certainly seems like they've cut corners with their QC over the last thirty years.
 
The best part is that a supervisor allegedly ran onto the production floor shouting "Everyone get the fuck out of the building" as soon as he caught wind that the feds were on their way.
 
Oops, looks like I forgot to use the "half-joking" font in my post.

Egan, "It certainly seems like they've cut corners with their QC over the last thirty years." This is an excellent point and I just hadn't gotten there yet.
 
Haha, yeah sorry, you're right of course. I'm definitely not taking your post overly seriously but a lot of people honestly believe that argument (and use it whenever they get a speeding ticket) and it irritates me.
In this particular case though I think Gibson can and should be able to track their sources. They use a lot of wood but they have a lot of employees. Maybe they could put the design team that came up with the backwards flying V in charge of the data entry that tracks serial numbers, wood sources and dealer shipments instead of letting them perform abortions on classic styles.
Perhaps someone has a grudge against them but they could pretty easily combat this with the sort of data management giant corporations are capable of.
 
I really should have thought before I posted.
In my line of work, I have to be able to trace steel back to the origins of the ore and chemical components used during the firing and rolling processes on some projects, so it hardly seems like an unreasonable request to follow wood the same way.
I'm having an off day, that's all.
 
All opinions about Gibson and their recent output aside, it's hard not to take their side with this story. There have been no charges filed about the wood and guitars that the feds seized from them in 2009, yet this property of Gibson remains locked up with the feds. Gibson tried to file a civil suit about this but the judge was ordered to halt the case indefinitely.

This latest raid appears equally baseless. Until the feds are able to produce some sort of evidence of wrongdoing, or attempt something resembling due process, this just isn't fair or even constitutional.