Diabolik
Member
I'm guessing you paid at the Widow show in KS. the other week then because it looked like there was not promoting at all.
you forgot....they are longtime buddies. He got drunk with them once. So it is all cool.
I'm guessing you paid at the Widow show in KS. the other week then because it looked like there was not promoting at all.
you forgot....they are longtime buddies. He got drunk with them once. So it is all cool.
you forgot....they are longtime buddies. He got drunk with them once. So it is all cool.
Actually I walked in and tried to paid, but Chris and John E. told me not to. I did hang out with them afterwards and smoke a lot of "medicine" with them so hopefully that compensated or the shots I bought them.
Yeah I live in Lawrence (35 miles west) so I dont know how well it was promoted, but I dont really work with Live Evil as much as I do with Hunt Industries.
Well that did not help out the other bands on the bill looking for a cut off the door. Honestly your money should have went to the bands if not to Widow there was at least two others. Buying shots for Widow did nothing for the other bands, so no it doesn't help.
It is really messed up that so many people out there are willing and up for hanging with the band to be cool or whatever but when it comes to supporting them those people leave the party when the weed is smoked up and the beer runs dry. I see this crap with so called "fans" and piss ant "promoters" and no one ever points it out or calls it what it is. At least the groupies give blows in the back of the van.
I'm not suggesting all of them are this way, some people have decency so I hear, but several are and they know it...Well I retract that, most convince themselves otherwise just like the downloading people. There is always something that "compensated".
So to sum up if $4.00 shots can be aforded for the band then there is enough money to rightly pay at the door or buy a damn CD.
Amen brother.Hats off to the people who are buying CD's, going to the shows and buying merchandise at the show. this is what fuels the scene....not stealing and using bands for your own sake.
It is a sad state when people say that they support the scene and help bands but in reality it is something they do just to be seen and so they can name drop.
My biggest concern...say you find a download from a band that blows you away. Not many people have heard it nor will they, due to whatever circumstance. 3 years from now your iPod dies, 6 months after your harddrive fried...and you do not have this bands cd backed up anywhere. Now you cannot find a download to replace this...what then? People say that anything is available on the internet, but if you ever spent time looking for something rare, you know how untrue that statement is...Where do you find this download again?
Just a question without a good answer...
I only download stuff from LaserCD!
This is another main reason why I like to have the physical property apposed to downloads. If your computer/hard drive crashes, you're fucked.
ny people have heard it nor will they, due to whatever circumstance. 3 years from now your iPod dies, 6 months after your harddrive fried...and you do not have this bands cd backed up anywhere. Now you cannot find a download to replace this...what then?
I have ever only had one album downloaded and that was the first Noah Jones, had to be sure. That weekend I went and bought the CD. However most people I know who say they download it first then go buy it usually don't. It is merely a way for them to try to make themselves not look like a jackass when in the conversation about this subject.
So you understand the argument of most of the pro-downloaders here - we have to be sure before we buy. You've done it yourself. Sure, some people say they will buy the CD if they like it but really don't; statistically I'm sure there are a LOT more in that category than there are who actually buy the CD, especially when you figure in the <20 crowd that really doesn't have the money yet but has tons of "peer pressure" that is such a bulls@#T excuse like the concept of A.D.D.
This seems backwards to me. I would say that it's much easier to get fucked with CDs than mp3s. If your home has a fire or is burglarized (and as this thread shows, those are not just theoretical possibilities), how do you recover that rare recording in that case? Whereas, if you're using a non-physical storage medium, when a hard drive dies or gets destoyed/stolen, you just go to your backup and immediately restore it.
What's that? You don't have a backup of your music? Well, then that's a failing of the *user*, not a failing of the storage medium. Since both CDs and electronically stored mp3s can be lost/damaged/destroyed, a backup of your collection is highly-recommended regardless of what medium you prefer. The difference is that it's FAR easier to make a duplicate of an electronically-stored mp3 collection than a CD collection. You can do a one-step copy of your entire collection onto a device the size of a paperback book, and store it at a different site than your main hard drive. Safe, fast, and easy. I keep my "backup" drive at my office, with the bonus that I then have my entire collection always available to listen to at my office as well as my home.
Electronic storage and delivery of music may have its downsides vs. CD, but recovery is definitely *not* a downside!
Neil
It was impressive, hell still is. And he still hits me up for stuff like that Worldtrade, yeah glad to help
and if i can paraphrase your statement when you traded your good copy for my water damaged copy you said something to the effect of. "yeah man, i listened to that World Trade CD again and it still sucks."
gotcha. haha.