Hi Steven,
Thank you for your e-mail. Phew, I hope I won't be getting too many e-
mails of this length regarding this specific issue It was not
meant to be known to the public until after the tour, it's
unbelievable how things are spreading. The local news paper managed
to find out and then a few days later it's all over the Internet -
still have problems understanding how fast these things get public.
Afraid? You think this is about my personal fingerprints? Paranoia? I
am not afraid for my own sake. It was never about that. If you fail
to see how having your physical unique fingerprints registered by a
foreign government infringes on integrity and global democratic
values then I guess we are very far apart in this discussion to start
with. I want to go to the States - I planned a car trip through
Arizona next summer. I long to play our music for the wonderful US
fans. But I will not have my finger prints registered to go to ANY
country. It is simply not done. It ends here.
Your government is now passing laws without going through the senate,
bypassing important democratic constructions that were built and
maintained for the people, for democracy and freedom - that's where
the Star Wars analogy comes in. The States was the new world, built
in many aspects to start again fresh from the paranoid, powerful and
conservative reign of the British Empire. Where are those ideas and
ideals now? The values that built your country are being flushed down
the drain by people who are afraid, people who have lost control and
try to regain it by use of sheer power. The forefathers of your
beloved constitution would start to weep if they were not already
weeping from having been misquoted and used as rhetorical bats (not
referring to the animal by the way) so many times already during the
last five decades.
Fingerprints are just as signatures in the states? First of all I
think you are way off here. Secondly; so even if they were? What leap
of logic makes you use normative behavior as an equivalent of an
analogous level of correctness? Even if you would have to leave your
fingerprints on a daily basis just to go to the bathroom, that
wouldn't make it right, would it? There are tons of examples of the
most horrid things that people in different nations have done without
raising an eyebrow, because it was the norm. So what? What is your
point?
Are you really comparing fingerprints to pictures? I cannot believe
that you are serious about this. I might add that there is no other
country that I've been to where they will take your picture at the
border and store that in governmental files, but even if they did
(which I would find very annoying from a democratic point of view
also by the way) I would find that to be on a completely different
scale than having your fingerprint registered. Next step will be
retina scans - how about that, you feel comfortable with that too?
Where do YOU draw the line? And do not consider this from a point of
view where people are getting into your country, imagine what you
would be willing to submit yourself to just in order to go to another
country, say, France or Canada. Your government has also passed a law
about an upcoming state ID as I understand it. You will need IDs to
go from state to state - so what's the point of having a nation then?
When did you agree to this? When were you asked or informed about
this? If you stuff enough orange and red codes down people's throats
they seem very reluctant to defend their open and free society.
I always found "Brave New World" to be much more interesting than
"1984" because where the latter is a supposed-to-be-scary vision of a
future based dictatorship-like Big Brother society, the former is
based on the idea that all those cut-downs on freedom and democracy
can be made with the full support of the people. Status, easy living
and a loving touch of fear - that's the key to a good grip on the
people. See, the reign through dictatorship never works in the long
run because if you slip for a second you will be overthrown. But with
the right conditioning, the people will submit themselves to marking,
registering, surveillance and control - and they will pay for it and
say thank you afterwards. Of course this is not made by an evil
leader - I don't believe in good and evil. It is done by a scared
leader. In some american states you can now have an electronic ID
surgically implanted in your wrist. Sure, it costs money, but then
you're able to pay for your beer simply by putting your wrist on a
reading device. All new mobile phones can be traced geographically,
like a homing device. Sure, they are expensive, but they have very
nice cameras and polyphonic signals. Public surveillance cameras?
Well, I have been very scared of criminality lately, and I have
nothing to hide so... Retina scans? Sure, you want my DNA too,
perhaps my first born child? This is not a good way - you are
treading down a bad path. It has been done before and it never works
out in the long run. That's all I'm saying.
I am losing potential money by sticking to my ideals - yes. I do not
see what's wrong with that.
I am not the one inhibiting my freedom. Your government is. They set
up the conditions that I cannot possibly accept. Anyone could do the
same thing for you, just let us know where you draw YOUR line. The
leap of logic here is just enormous and again, it beckons me to read
things like this. By the way, my fingerprints are not in my passport,
just to inform you. Neither is my DNA. My picture and my signature is
in there, along with all the personal information about age,
appearance and so on. And I would say that, along with the
information that I have already submitted to your government about my
whereabouts for the last 10 years (date-by-date), all my educations
and addresses to all schools and employers, all the information about
my wife and family and all the papers I have filled in promising not
to do this or that or to bring snails into your country - don't you
think that should be enough? I have submitted all that and more. Now
you want fingerprints, and retina scans is on their way. This is
where I draw the line. Especially since I heard the other week that
your government threatened Brazil with a complete market stop
(embargo, is that the right word?) when they wanted to use
fingerprints too. Apparently, this is a one-way right at the moment.
I cannot submit to this, I simply cannot. I am making a stand for
what I truly believe in - and I have nothing to gain from it.
So you hate the decisions just as much as I do? Well, you can vote.
Tada. As for the others of us, we can only watch and take the
consequences. These are my only means of democratic action - the
decision not to leave my fingerprints. It is not for my own sake, but
for the sake of global democracy and human rights. It is what is
usually called a "principle" (a concept frowned upon by much of
contemporary society it seems). This is NOT done. This is NOT right.
We are heading the wrong way, step by step, in steps so small that we
never feel that we're crossing lines. But the direction is pretty
clear. Well, I am stopping here, this is the step, of so many, that I
simply won't take. You go on if you like, I won't stop you even
though I cannot understand how you can possibly feel fine with
proceeding - I am making my stand and I am making it here. I am
truly sorry for the US fans. I am sorry for myself. But most of all,
I am sorry for freedom and democracy. Two concepts that have been so
often used to defend many actions, but have so seldom been defended
in action themselves.
On a final note; yes, I believe that one person can change the world.
That's why I still take action for what I believe in, even if I am
alone in this decision. You say you contacted me because you believe
this too and hoped to change my mind. Well, the difference between
you and me regarding this, is that you are trying to change my mind
into what everybody else does. I claim I am taking sides with
democracy, human rights, freedom, globalism and humanism. I also
claim I am taking sides with the American people. You would probably
claim the same, which means one of us is wrong. I hate to say this,
but I'm pretty sure it's not me.
With as much love as I can possibly muster,
Daniel
PS: You are free to publish this on the forum if you wish, as part of
the discussion.